{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"ScholarlyArticle","headline":"The current understanding of precision medicine and personalised medicine in selected research disciplines: study protocol of a systematic concept analysis.","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Nicola Brew-Sam"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Anne Parkinson"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Christian Lueck"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Ellen Brown"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Karen Brown"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Anne Bruestle"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Katrina Chisholm"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Simone Collins"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Matthew Cook"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Eleni Daskalaki"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Janet Drew"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Harry Ebbeck"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Mark Elisha"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Vanessa Fanning"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Adam Henschke"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Jessica Herron"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Emma Matthews"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Krishnan Murugappan"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Dragomir Neshev"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Christopher J Nolan"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Lachlan Pedley"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Christine Phillips"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Hanna Suominen"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Antonio Tricoli"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Kristine Wright"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Jane Desborough"}],"datePublished":"2022","isPartOf":{"@type":"Periodical","name":"BMJ open"},"identifier":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060326","description":"\n Introduction\n The terms ‘precision medicine’ and ‘personalised medicine’ have become key terms in health-related research and in science-related public communication. However, the application of these two concepts and their interpretation in various disciplines are heterogeneous, which also affects research translation and public awareness. This leads to confusion regarding the use and distinction of the two concepts. Our aim is to provide a snapshot of the current understanding of these concepts.\n \n \n Methods and analysis\n Our study will use Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis to systematically examine the current understanding of the concepts ‘precision medicine’ and ‘personalised medicine’ in clinical medicine, biomedicine (incorporating genomics and bioinformatics), health services research, physics, chemistry, engineering, machine learning and artificial intelligence, and to identify their respective attributes (clusters of characteristics) and surrogate and related terms. A systematic search of the literature will be conducted for 2016–2022 using databases relevant to each of these disciplines: ACM Digital Library, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, F1000Research, IEEE Xplore, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science. These are among the most representative databases for the included disciplines. We will examine similarities and differences in definitions of ‘precision medicine’ and ‘personalised medicine’ in the respective disciplines and across (sub)disciplines, including attributes of each term. This will enable us to determine how these two concepts are distinguished.\n \n \n Ethics and dissemination\n Following ethical and research standards, we will comprehensively report the methodology for a systematic analysis following Rodgers’ concept analysis method. Our systematic concept analysis will contribute to the clarification of the two concepts and distinction in their application in given settings and circumstances. Such a broad concept analysis will contribute to non-systematic syntheses of the concepts, or occasional systematic reviews on one of the concepts that have been published in specific disciplines, in order to facilitate interdisciplinary communication, translational medical research and implementation science.\n ","url":"https://innscience.ca/en/community/literature/bb975e9b-0362-415a-9fe0-918041c27649"}